Redistricting jury should pick Florida's new plan

J.H. Snider | Sun Sentinel | 11/23/2015

After a regular and two special sessions of Florida's Legislature failed to pass a legislative redistricting map compliant with Florida's Constitution, Florida's courts are now in charge of the redistricting. Circuit Court Judge George Reynolds has scheduled a Dec. 14-18 trial to begin the process of choosing a map from those submitted to him. His recommendation will then be passed on to Florida's Supreme Court.

Legislators have an inherent conflict of interest in drawing legislative districts because in doing so they are picking their voters, which violates the democratic principle that voters should pick their representatives. This conflict results in a gerrymander.

The alternative of having judges choose maps is also problematic because doing so undermines the judiciary's legitimacy. Americans believe that judges decide fundamental election questions, including legislative redistricting, based on partisan and pro-incumbent criteria. The problem was vividly illustrated in Bush vs. Gore, the U.S. Supreme Court case that determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. Florida and U.S. supreme court judges denied partisan motivation, but the public didn't believe them.

Fortunately, a way exists for judges to preserve their legitimacy while upholding Florida's Constitution. Judges inherently have the power to convene a jury, including a "redistricting jury," to choose among submitted redistricting maps. Here's how a redistricting jury could work:

Judge Reynolds would convene a randomly selected jury consisting of 240 jurors, a man and women from each of Florida's 120 House districts and mirroring the partisan composition of Florida's registered voters. He would then instruct the jury in redistricting law (e.g., districts should be compact and utilize existing political boundaries).

The jury would be a "virtual" jury in that the jurors would meet in circuit courts near their homes and telecommute with Judge Reynolds' court in Tallahassee.

The jury would have no power to draft maps, only to choose among the submitted ones.

The jury would meet for only one day. Advocates for each map would make their initial case, then rebut their opponents' arguments. Jurors would then vote.

Florida's Supreme Court would review the map to ensure it complied with state law.

Would this result in a perfect district plan? Certainly not. But the practical question is whether it would improve upon the status quo. The answer, I believe, is yes.

Independent jurors would tend to block partisan gerrymanders and all would tend to block pro-incumbent gerrymanders.

If a redistricting jury were implemented earlier in the redistricting process, it would also save money. Florida's legislature spent more than $11 million dollars on redistricting during 2015, mostly on litigation. Multiplying the daily fee paid to Florida jurors ($15 per day) by the 240 jurors, a redistricting jury would cost less than 0.1 percent of that.

Instead of being the last step in the redistricting process, some version of a redistricting jury could one day be the first. Unlike the proposal here, that would require a constitutional amendment. But the democratic principle animating a redistricting jury would remain: the people, not those with an inherent conflict of interest, should decide.

J.H. Snider, a former American Political Science Association congressional fellow working on the staff of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, is president of

Legal battle over state Senate districts coming to an end

TALLAHASSEE - A contentious battle over Florida state senate districts is coming to an end. read more »

Senate won't appeal redistricting ruling

Clearing the way for elections later this year with a map that could boost Democrats' numbers in the Senate, Republican leaders decided Wednesday not to appeal a Leon County judge's ruling setting districts for the chamber's 40 seats. read more »

Florida Senate won't appeal ruling on new districts

TALLAHASSEE — Senate leaders said Wednesday that they will not appeal last month's court ruling that sided with a voters' coalition in setting new district boundaries. read more »

Florida Legislature won't appeal redistricting ruling

TALLAHASSEE — The Florida Legislature is giving up the fight and will not contest a court ruling that redraws all of the state's 40 state senate districts for the 2016 election cycle. read more »

Editorial: Republicans should accept redistricting defeat and drop talk of appeals

For a brief moment last week it appeared the Florida Legislature had come to its senses and was willing to accept a judge's ruling on the boundaries for new state Senate districts. read more »

Renumbering state Senate districts triggers political scramble

TALLAHASSEE — It may sound like a simple process, but the Florida Senate's random renumbering of all its districts statewide Tuesday touched off a series of complicated twists that one key lawmaker said only adds more chaos to a continuing redistricting saga. read more »